From the medieval Swiss confederation to the English Magna Carta, harkening all the way back to ancient Israel and god's covenant with the Israelites, confederal styled limited sovereign government has always been at the very core of Judeo-Christian civilization.

As Islam grew to devour and annihilate the classical world, Christian powers such as France were able to fend off the Arab Caliphate in the West.

Later, unable to break into Europe by brute force alone, the Turkish Caliphate resorted to sponsoring humanists within the West to erode, divide and weaken Judeo-Christendom from within.

With financial backing from the Ottoman Empire, relying on infiltration through Sufi lodge styled networks of operatives, various humanist elements were able to splinter the Christian world from within, leading to various manifestations of Protestantism, itself a precursor to imposing the outright humanistic atheism that is omnipresent today.

Like many nations, England was not spared this violent barbaric manifestation of usurpation of power, during it's own civil war: it was similar in it's violence to the French Revolution, the Russian revolution, and countless other nations victimized by this system of national usurpation (China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, etc.).

Using the Islamic preferred form of desecration, the English humanists decapitated their King and rendered the Catholic faith illegal.

In the decades following this national trauma, accumulating inequities began to spill over into the new world, where the 13 British colonies were gradually more and more openly and literally oppressed.

Enjoying a high level of autonomy and literacy, the colonists of the 13 American colonies attempted to obtain redress for the accumulating burdensome injustices being imposed on them by the morally impaired British Empire.

Having run out of instances and failing to achieve any resolution, they elected to seek independence and form their own union, where the population itself would be sovereign.

In this effort, France played a pivotal role: providing the fledgling American nation with over 90% of it's gunpowder, along with a sizeable naval and army commitment. So vast was the French effort at supporting the American revolutionaries that the French state in fact bankrupted itself.

This event was the effective transference of the leadership of the Christian world from France to the United States, with France soon after imploding under it's own barbaric revolution which resulted in the organized genocide of close to a million people in the Vendée.

The immediate result of this successful campaign of independence was the enactment of a newborn nation aiming immediately to institute itself as a form of 'New Atlantis' based on the vision imagined by Francis Bacon much earlier.

In this new type of nation, the country would be restored as the servant and defender of the inhabitants, the literal opposite of the historical norm for much of stillfallen mankind.

In this system the sovereignty belongs to the individuals composing the nation, who then consent to delegating a portion of their inherent power to their regional state. In turn this state delegates a portion of it's own mandate to a central state habilitated to make war, manage alliances, oversee international trade and guarantee national borders.

After some debate between the representatives, it was elected that the United States would take shape as a confederal constitutional republic.

To this aim the gathered representatives established a new written constitutional order referred to today as "the articles of confederation". 

This original constitution of the United States of America contained two very relevant articles:

Firstly, the central government established by this sovereign confederation was mandated to protect the inhabitants of the member states from any and all hostile ideologies (such as communism and jihadism) and religions (such as humanism and Islam).

Secondly, it made it a point of purpose to expressly codify that an invitation for membership as 14th state was extended and valid indefinitely for Canada to join the confederation, with guarantees for it's ability to maintain French as its language and the Catholic faith as its religion (no small feat in that era considering the bad rap Catholics were getting from many humanist leaning quarters).

This is especially noteworthy considering the fact that at the time, literacy in the 13 colonies was over 80%, while in Canada (then composed mostly of French Canadians), the literacy rate was below 20%.

While it's neighbor to the South underwent a radical change through revolution, the Canadian experience was less volcanic.

Receiving a large influx of American loyalists who came to found what we know now as 'Upper Canada', it was through progressive growing pains that Canadians attained a maturation resulting in the realization of their sovereign rights, formalized fully with their original constitution established in 1867, which instituted a confederal constitutional monarchy over the land.

This evolution was accelerated by political forces in Quebec musing with the notion of Imperial Federation or advocating for outright Annexation of Canada into the United States, causing the British Empire to rethink it's calculations in order to secure its remaining North American holdings.

In this original constitution, Canada guaranteed French-Canadians the constitutional right to a Catholic education, and English-Canadians enjoyed the same privilege but from an Anglican perspective.

It did not take long for humanist elements already active even among the founding fathers to push back against this expression of confederal sovereignty.

Only a few short years later, while incredible barbarity was being visited by rabidly inhumane humanist cohorts upon a defiled and savaged France, a new illicit constitution was imposed unlawfully upon the United States. Having convened officially to amend the original constitution, humanist agents thought it proper to simply redact a brand new constitution and impose it from that moment forward. 

This new humanist version of the American constitution was immediately perceived for what it was (and still is): incredibly overcentralized and excessive in its attribution of power to the central government. The member states pushed back against this attempt at outright usurpation by demanding the inclusion of a 'bill of rights', which would impose strict limitations to restrain the power enjoyed by that emerging system of federal government.

Later, the process of progressive democratization of political institutions was ongoing and relentless: By having Senators elected directly by the population rather than selected by the state governments, the states were prevented from having their interests represented effectively in the central government, and became unable to exercise their duty as rightful interpreters of the constitution.

Indeed, at this point the legislative branch became implicated in a gross conflict of interest, itself being part of the central government. It could not be accepted as an impartial stakeholder when it comes to determining what that government can or can't do. On the contrary, this was a sure shot recipe for enabling the unlimited government that is pervasive today.

Another subsequent development involved the radical innovation of imposing the bill of rights not just on the central government, but also on all state governments. This is at the root of the massive division of society into two radicalized camps verging on civil strife, taking turns holding power to impose their world view on the other side while undoing its previous efforts.

In recent decades, through legalisms of every sort, congress has become a ceremonial chamber lacking any real power, no different to the European Union parliament: rubber stampers of laws designed by unelected corridor brokers pushing an agenda far removed from any notion of subsidiarity in government.

In spite of all this the country through the quality of it's people was able to shine brightly in the 20th century, fulfilling it's role as defender of the West during two world wars and one cold war.

However today, much of the population is living paycheck to paycheck, and is locked in a process of accelerated impoverishment, with the country as a whole facing hyper inflation and a soft collapse not dissimilar to the final lap of the western Roman Empire.

Actual power (financial, economic, political, educational, media) is now opaque, commonly wielded by interests openly hostile to Judeo-Christian civilization as demonstrated by their unrelenting assaults on capitalist principles such as private ownership, free speech and free enterprise. 

The systematic dismantling of constitutional protections is emboldening a push for blatantly socialist policies, suffocating the population into a state of collective impoverishment approaching third world status, with massive amounts of wealth and resources drained away permanently.

Without determined and decisive political action, the current status quo will lead to the complete collapse of contemporary civilization.

Similarly, Canada has also been diverted on a humanist induced decline, through a second constitution that was also imposed illicitly, this time in 1982, replacing the lawful confederal arrangement with the current federal setup, without the required unanimous consent of member provinces. Since then a humanist charter was put in place to prevent Canadians from being able to resist the progressive imposition of Islam in general society.

In a way, as the only non-signatory party to the 1982 constitution, Quebec is the last holdout of the classical confederal Canada of 1867. 

To provide a catalyst for renovating the political foundations of the free world and to protect itself from hostile ideologies and religions, Quebec must vote to accept the invitation to join the Confederal United States, and automatically become the only currently active member of that perpetual union.

Upon successfully voting to join the Confederal United States, Quebec must immediately begin friendly multi-lateral negotiations with relevant stakeholders to effect a peaceful and equitable transference of sovereignty to the new arrangement.

It must also equip the fledgling confederation with a new article fully defining the mechanism for entering or leaving the union, so that member states and their constituents are protected from unwanted impositions.

It must then extend an invitation to the various states and provinces that have at one point or another (as well as by historical inference) been part of either the Canadian Constitutional Confederal Monarchy or the American Constitutional Confederal Republic for open talks about potentially rejoining this revived arrangement.

A Sovereign Congress should be held if sufficient interest and appetite among the regional jurisdictions exists. Each should vote to select two personalities to represent them in those open ended talks.

Once that initial stage has been put in place, a formal approach to free nations worldwide should be made extending them a similar offer, regardless of the current level of duress and intimidation they are currently subjected to.

The cases of Israel being threatened with outright annihilation by most Islamic powers and of Taiwan, itself threatened with invasion and conquest by the radical humanists of the Communist regime in mainland China immediately come to mind.

Further organic expansion of the sovereign confederation could be contemplated with a focus on free and developed countries, such as the United Kingdom, Norway, Switzerland, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, etc. 

Countries currently controlled by hostile anti-civilization elements, while not eligible for joining, could be aided in their development so that they might be able to self-govern effectively and hence become likely candidates for future incorporation, should there be a sufficiently strong mutual desire between sovereign confederation members and themselves for such an outcome.

Eventually this political arrangement would provide a just and equitable way for mankind to unite through informed mutual consent, over time. While this process would take generations to fully be realized, there would be no obligation or guarantee that it would ever expand beyond a very restrained number of initial member states, given that the sovereign consent would have to be obtained by the constituents at every single step of the way.